<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Photojournalism as Art? You be the judge!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.multimediashooter.com/wp/uncategorized/photojournalism-as-art-you-be-the-judge/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.multimediashooter.com/wp/uncategorized/photojournalism-as-art-you-be-the-judge/</link>
	<description>keeping track, so you don't have to...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 15:04:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Yen</title>
		<link>http://www.multimediashooter.com/wp/uncategorized/photojournalism-as-art-you-be-the-judge/comment-page-1/#comment-20627</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Yen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 02:02:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.multimediashooter.com/wp/?p=679#comment-20627</guid>
		<description>I agree Richard.

As long as we&#039;re accurate and authentic,
who needs standardized rules for reportage
(such as AP style, yuck..)?

Of course, that&#039;s not to say that we as individuals shouldn&#039;t express how we think it should be done in these crazy mixed up times of chaos and digital anarchy (and seeing as how art is expression and all).

Magnum is certainly the best and most artistic for photojournalism on the whole, but I personally would like to see them innovate and experiment more with interactivity and the non-linear narrative.

For starters they need to recruit more multimedia gurus such as yourself to their membership. You know, if they want to maintain their leadership in the field. Not that they aren&#039;t already doing a damn good job of it of course.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree Richard.</p>
<p>As long as we&#8217;re accurate and authentic,<br />
who needs standardized rules for reportage<br />
(such as AP style, yuck..)?</p>
<p>Of course, that&#8217;s not to say that we as individuals shouldn&#8217;t express how we think it should be done in these crazy mixed up times of chaos and digital anarchy (and seeing as how art is expression and all).</p>
<p>Magnum is certainly the best and most artistic for photojournalism on the whole, but I personally would like to see them innovate and experiment more with interactivity and the non-linear narrative.</p>
<p>For starters they need to recruit more multimedia gurus such as yourself to their membership. You know, if they want to maintain their leadership in the field. Not that they aren&#8217;t already doing a damn good job of it of course.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

